![]() Sure a mall can't, in theory, prevent another group of investors from building a mall #2 next door. On balance, if malls & rent are the comparison point, they roughly balance. But then again shopping malls don't scan a store's products for basic problems or defects. Shopping malls charged rent, and if you look up typical rent-to-revenue ratios you'll find that ~10% is in the range of average, ~20% around the the top end of the range, so not far off the 15% but yes, a bargain compared to 30%. >Shopping malls don't even demand a 15%-30% cut of revenue. It’s certainly interesting to think about. I also suspect Google’s intentions (to say the least) and consider that they really like the extra phone numbers they’ll get people to cough up. That being said, I’m not sure if the positive outweighs the negative. I see that Google likes to be heavy-handed (and is being so), which I don’t like to see, but this might actually be a positive for someone other than Google (or their business partners), which I do like to see. From that angle, Google might prefer to dictate these terms. ![]() The developers should be able to decide for themselves how to provide that information, as well as what to provide.īut then that has issues considering developers who might choose “send a letter to this PO box”, so there still has to be some verification that it’s not “too” inconvenient to the end user. I think there is another point that it eases support contact for users to developers. Yeah, I agree with that too it would be preferable if the privacy concern was “only” that it has to be sent to Google and not be displayed publicly. So you're technically right of course, aurora still works, but if the apps that you can fetch from there don't work, then can I really tell people that they can use aurora instead of the play store? A friend that makes an Android game says he heard that he needs to update the in-app purchases SDK before November 2023, so presumably that's when all apps go dark that have any sort of plus/pro/premium version or donation functionality The developer of Stellarium Mobile says this is going to be the new standard for all apps. If you don't and you just hit back or something, the app closes. Whether it will work then, since Google doesn't know that you have this app installed (since you used Aurora), I don't know. if you do, then it will open up the Play Store specifically and require you sign in there. if you don't have the Play Store enabled, it will throw a stack trace about not being able to reach the licensing server, which manifests in the UI as a pop-up message telling you to reinstall the app (lol) or suck it up, and when you dismiss it, the app closes. Aurora lets you download and install the apk, but when you then open Stellarium Mobile, then either:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |